CT Radiomics for Tissue Prediction

Exploratory analysis of ex vivo liver specimen

21
Biopsy Samples
At different CT locations
12
CT Features
Intensity-based radiomics
3
Models
Tumor, necrosis, fibrosis
0.94
Avg R²
Correlation observed

Overview

Study goals and context

Workflow

Methods and process

Results

Model performance

Discussion

Progress and notes

Project Overview

Study Goal

  • Explore if CT radiomic features correlate with tissue composition
  • Test feasibility of predicting tumor, necrosis, and fibrosis from imaging
  • Validate workflow for imaging-pathology correlation
Liver specimen
Resected left hepatic lobe
CT imaging
CT imaging of specimen
Pathology annotation
H&E pathology annotation

Approach

  • 21 biopsy samples collected at different locations across ex vivo liver specimen
  • H&E staining with pathologist annotations for ground truth (tumor, necrosis, fibrosis)
  • 12 CT imaging features extracted from voxels at each biopsy location (intensity-based radiomics)
  • Multiple linear regression models built to predict tissue composition from CT features

Annotated Biopsy Specimen Histology

H&E stained liver biopsy specimens with pathologist annotations (yellow outlines) showing tissue regions used for ground truth classification.

Annotated biopsy specimen histology

Specimen Annotation Comparison

Side-by-side comparison of H&E stained specimen and pathologist annotations showing tumor regions (red) and necrosis/hemorrhage (green).

Specimen annotation comparison

Note: Exploratory study with n=21 biopsy samples. Demonstrates methodology, not validated clinical findings.

Analysis Workflow

Click each step for details

1
Specimen & CT Imaging
  • Resected left hepatic lobe from NCI Lab
  • In vivo and ex vivo CT scans acquired
  • Segmentation and 3D reconstruction
Ex vivo segmentation
2
Biopsy Collection (21 samples)
  • 21 core needle biopsy samples collected at different locations
  • Distributed across tumor and surrounding tissue
  • CT scanned with needles in place for precise 3D coordinate registration
Biopsy locations
3
Pathology Analysis (Ground Truth)
  • H&E staining on all 21 biopsy samples
  • Pathologist annotated tumor, necrosis, fibrosis
  • Calculated % composition for each tissue type at each location
Tissue proportions
4
CT Feature Extraction (49 features)
  • Defined 16×16×3 voxel ROI at each of the 21 biopsy locations
  • 49 intensity-based CT radiomic features extracted per location
  • Features computed per IBSI guidelines: intensity statistics, histogram metrics, texture descriptors
5
Feature Reduction (49 → 12)
  • Pair-wise correlation filtering applied to avoid multicollinearity
  • Reduced from 49 to 12 independent CT imaging features
  • Final matrix: 21 biopsy samples × 12 CT radiomic features
6
Model Building
  • Built 3 multiple linear regression models
  • Model 1: 12 CT features → Predict % Tumor
  • Model 2: 12 CT features → Predict % Necrosis
  • Model 3: 12 CT features → Predict % Fibrosis

Results

0.95
Adjusted R²
0.90
RMSE
5.16%
p-value
1.1×10-4
Tumor prediction
0.92
Adjusted R²
0.84
RMSE
5.92%
p-value
3.2×10-4
Necrosis prediction
0.94
Adjusted R²
0.90
RMSE
1.67%
p-value
3.5×10-6
Fibrosis prediction

Key Observations

  • All three models show strong correlations (R² 0.92-0.95) in this dataset
  • 12 CT intensity-based features captured tissue composition signal
  • Proof-of-concept for CT-to-pathology correlation workflow
  • Results are exploratory with 21 biopsy samples, not clinically validated

Discussion

Progress So Far

  • Complete workflow from biopsy collection to modeling validated
  • 12 CT radiomic features correlate with pathology at 21 biopsy locations
  • Methodology is reusable for other imaging-pathology datasets
  • Dataset available for analysis: 27 patients with CT-guided liver biopsies, of which 17 patients have tumor specimen

Notes

  • Single specimen: Cannot assess generalization across patients
  • Ex vivo to in vivo: Will our findings on ex vivo translate well onto in vivo imaging?

Discussion Questions

  • How to make use of the remaining funds?
  • Are there datasets that could benefit from the CT radiomics approach?
  • This framework is also being applied to the ultrasound-guided biopsy data registered on MRI (ultrasound-MRI biopsy dataset available on TCIA)
Created with Claude Sonnet & Opus 4.5